Menu
Delivery partners

Need a bigger team?
you can have one.

Most of what I take on is work where one senior engineer is the right answer. When it genuinely is not — an ERP-scale build, several workstreams at once — I bring in firms I have delivered alongside, and I stay accountable for the engineering.

You interview everyone

No developer joins your project without you meeting them first. Agencies rarely allow this, because the person who sold is not the person who builds.

You know who employs them

I do not keep a bench on payroll and I will not pretend a partner's staff are mine. You are told exactly who works for whom.

One accountable owner

I stay the technical owner and your single point of contact. When something breaks, you call me, not a queue.

I say no when it fits

If a partner is not right for your scope, I will tell you rather than staff it anyway.

Why no logos

You will not find a logo wall on this page. Partner identities are theirs to disclose, not mine — and the discretion I show them is the discretion you get too.

Once we are engaged and under NDA, I introduce them directly. You can diligence them like any vendor: company registration, references, and the specific people who would work on your project. Before that point, naming them tells you nothing verifiable anyway.

If a partner-delivered team is what you need, that conversation happens properly — with the actual firm in the room, not a logo on a marketing page.

Primary delivery partner

Identity shared under NDA once engaged

Primary

An established software firm I have delivered alongside, used when a build needs a full team rather than one senior engineer. Enterprise and ERP-scale scope, across web, mobile and AI.

This is the firm I turn to when scope outgrows one person — multi-workstream builds, ERP-scale delivery, or a project that needs designers, QA and several developers running in parallel.

What stays constant is accountability: I remain the technical owner and your single point of contact. You interview every developer before they join. You are told plainly who employs them. Nobody is presented as mine who is not.

I do not publish their name here, for the same reason I will not publish yours: identity is theirs to disclose, not mine. Once we are engaged and under NDA, I introduce them directly and you can diligence them like any vendor — company registration, references, the team you would actually get.

Backend engineering Mobile development Frontend engineering QA Laravel PHP React React Native AI / LLM
Based — India

Secondary delivery partner

Identity shared under NDA once engaged

A smaller team I work with for focused builds needing two or three developers alongside me, rather than a full delivery organisation.

Not every project that needs more hands needs a whole firm. This partner covers the middle ground — a couple of experienced developers working to my architecture and review, on scope I have already shaped.

Same rules: you interview them, you know who employs them, and I stay accountable for the engineering.

Backend engineering Frontend engineering Laravel PHP React

Specialist partner

Identity shared under NDA once engaged

Brought in for work outside my own depth — where the honest answer is that someone else should do this part.

There is work I am not the right person for, and pretending otherwise costs clients more than admitting it. When a project needs a discipline I do not practise at a senior level, I would rather bring in someone who does than learn on your budget.

If even that is not the right fit, I will say so and point you elsewhere. A referral I make and stand behind is worth more to both of us than a project I take and get wrong.

Got scope that needs a team?

Tell me the scope and the deadline. If it needs more than me, I will say so — and introduce the people who can do it.

Get in touch ↗